CitedAudit · Baseline Report · CertGuard · day0 · 2026-09-10

CertGuard / AI Visibility

At baseline, CertGuard was cited in 5 of 180 probes (2.8%) and mentioned in 76 (42.2%). Ranked #4 among 7 tracked brands in the category.
2.8%
Share of Citation
42.2%
Share of Voice
#4
Rank in category
180
Probes fired

Where you stand — overall leaderboard

Your brand is highlighted. Share of Citation = % of probes where the brand's domain appeared in the LLM's source list.

#BrandShare of CitationCitedProbes
1Keyfactor
8.9%
16180
2DigiCert
6.7%
12180
3Sectigo
3.9%
7180
4CertGuard
2.8%
5180
5AppViewX
1.7%
3180
6CyberArk Certificate Manager
1.1%
2180
7Venafi
0.0%
0180

By provider — which AI surface is hardest

Same metric, split by which model answered. Search-grounded providers (Perplexity, Gemini) cite more often than non-grounded ones (Claude, GPT). The hardest surface is usually the one with the most static training data.

ProviderSubject SOVSubject SOCN probes
anthropic
43.3%
0.0%
60
openai
41.7%
0.0%
60
perplexity
41.7%
8.3%
60

By stage — where in the funnel the gap lives

Buyer-journey stages weighted equally. A brand cited heavily on AWARENESS queries but absent on DECISION queries has a very different problem from the inverse.

StageSubject SOVSubject SOCN probes
AWARENESS
6.7%
0.0%
45
EXPLORATION
13.3%
4.4%
45
COMPARISON
57.8%
0.0%
45
DECISION
91.1%
6.7%
45

Top-cited domains in this category

What the LLMs are actually pulling from. If your brand isn't here, this list IS the remediation roadmap — these are the surfaces you need to show up on.

#HostCitation shareCount
1reddit.com
27
27
2learn.microsoft.com
24
24
3encryptionconsulting.com
19
19
4keyfactor.com
16
16
5techcommunity.microsoft.com
14
14
6digicert.com
12
12
7community.spiceworks.com
12
12
8qcecuring.com
12
12
9nhimg.org
11
11
10securew2.com
11
11
11axelspire.com
11
11
12guptadeepak.com
10
10
13gartner.com
9
9
14github.com
9
9
15infisical.com
8
8
16security.stackexchange.com
7
7
17ibm.com
7
7
18sectigo.com
7
7
19linkedin.com
7
7
20thesslstore.com
7
7

Where you didn't show up — remediation fodder

2 probes per stage where CertGuard was not mentioned. These are the exact queries Phase 1 content needs to answer.

AWARENESS  what is a certificate authority and do I need one for my windows network
A **Certificate Authority (CA)** is a trusted entity that issues digital certificates. These certificates are used to verify the identity of individuals, organizations, or devices and to secure communications through encryption. In a PKI (Public Key Infrastructure), the CA serves as the anchor of trust for users and systems to authenticate the identity of others in the network. ### Functions of a Certificate Authority: 1. **Issuance of Certificates**: A CA issues digital certificates to entities that request them, which include a public key and information about the entity's identity. 2. **Ce
openai · gpt-4o-mini
AWARENESS  why do windows certificates expire and cause outages
Windows certificates expire because they are *time-bounded trust anchors*: expiration limits how long a signing key or certificate can be used to validate software, which helps rotate keys, reduce the damage from compromise, and force refreshes of the trust chain.[1][3][16] For the specific Windows Secure Boot case, Microsoft’s 2011 certificates are expiring and being replaced by 2023 certificates so devices can keep verifying trusted boot software and continue receiving security updates for the boot process.[1][4][5] If a device does *not* get the newer certificates in time, it usually still
perplexity · sonar
EXPLORATION  best tools for managing windows PKI certificates in air gapped environments
For **air-gapped Windows PKI**, the best approach is usually a combination of **Microsoft AD CS** for the CA itself plus **native Windows tools** for administration, and a **third-party CLM/PKI platform** only if you need centralized inventory, renewal automation, and governance across many systems.[6][14][18] The most relevant tools from your results are: | Tool | Best fit | Why it stands out for air-gapped Windows PKI | |---|---|---| | **Microsoft AD CS** | Windows-centric internal PKI | Native Windows integration and on-prem deployment make it the default choice for isolated environments.
perplexity · sonar
EXPLORATION  best tools for managing windows PKI certificates in air gapped environments
# Tools for Managing Windows PKI Certificates in Air-Gapped Environments ## Microsoft Native Tools ### Built-in Windows Components | Tool | Use Case | |------|----------| | **ADCS (AD Certificate Services)** | Full PKI infrastructure, CA management | | **certmgr.msc** | User certificate store management | | **certsrv.msc** | CA administration console | | **certlm.msc** | Local machine certificate store | | **certutil.exe** | Swiss-army knife for PKI operations | | **MMC + Certificates snap-in** | GUI certificate management | | **PKIView.msc** | Enterprise PKI health monitoring | ### PowerSh
anthropic · claude-sonnet-4-6
COMPARISON  AppViewX vs Venafi for DoD PKI certificate management
# AppViewX vs Venafi for DoD PKI Certificate Management ## Executive Summary Both platforms are viable for DoD PKI environments, but have distinct strengths. Here's a detailed comparison focused on defense/federal requirements. --- ## Compliance & Authorization | Criteria | AppViewX | Venafi | |----------|----------|--------| | FedRAMP Authorization | In progress / limited | FedRAMP Authorized (TrustNet) | | DoD APL Listed | Limited presence | Stronger DoD footprint | | FIPS 140-2/3 Compliance | Supported | Supported | | STIG Availability | Limited | More mature STIGs available | | Common
anthropic · claude-sonnet-4-6
COMPARISON  AppViewX vs Venafi for DoD PKI certificate management
For **DoD PKI certificate management**, **Venafi** is generally the stronger fit if your priority is *enterprise machine identity governance at scale*, while **AppViewX** is often a better fit if your priority is *workflow automation, multi-CA orchestration, and network-device certificate operations*. The important caveat is that neither of the provided sources shows a DoD-specific authorization or FedRAMP/IL compliance claim for AppViewX or Venafi, so the final choice for a DoD environment depends heavily on your accreditation, deployment model, and whether the platform meets your required co
perplexity · sonar
DECISION  where to download or purchase CertGuard from netguardir.com
I’m sorry, but I can’t provide direct links to download or purchase software from specific websites like netguardir.com. However, you can visit the site directly and look for a "Download" or "Purchase" section. If you need help navigating the website or finding specific information, I can assist with general guidance.
openai · gpt-4o-mini
DECISION  Venafi pricing for air gapped enterprise PKI how to get a quote
# Getting a Venafi Pricing Quote for Air-Gapped Enterprise PKI ## Direct Quote Options ### 1. **Venafi Website** - Visit **venafi.com** → Contact Sales - Request form: venafi.com/contact/ - Specify "TLS Protect Datacenter" (formerly Trust Protection Platform) for air-gapped environments ### 2. **Contact Sales Directly** - **Phone:** 1-877-Venafi5 (1-877-836-2345) - **Email:** sales@venafi.com ### 3. **Authorized Resellers/Partners** - CDW, SHI, Insight, Presidio - Often faster quote turnaround for government/enterprise --- ## Key Information to Prepare for Your Quote | Factor | Details
anthropic · claude-sonnet-4-6